Results of our studies

IN BRIEF

MOSCOW, April 18, 2019. Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM) presents the findings of a study on whether Russians came across fake news in traditional mass media and on the Internet, and whether they can determine the trustworthiness of the news.  

Over the last year or two 31% of Russians have come across fake news; respondents with higher education diplomas report so more often (38%). Every fifth Russian (20%) encountered fake news on television (26% of respondents with higher education diplomas). A further 7% came across stories which did not constitute the reality in newspapers; 5%, on the radio. However, 47% of Russians have not encountered fake news over the last year or two (71% of persons with certificates of incomplete secondary education and 38% of those with higher education diplomas).

Most of respondents (62%) who encountered fake stories in mass media and on the Internet felt from the very beginning that something was wrong; this share is higher among respondents living in St Petersburg and Moscow (74%). However, one-third (31%) was sure in the beginning that the information was true and it was only later that they found out it was fake (42% of rural area residents).

Seventy-four percent of those who saw fake stories in mass media and online think that they were published deliberately (84% of the 35-44-year-olds). They are opposed by 17% of respondents saying that most of fake stories were published unintentionally or mistakenly by the journalists. Most of those who think so are young respondents (26% of the 18-24-year-olds).  

VCIOM-Sputnik survey was conducted on April 16, 2019. The survey involved 1,600 Russians aged 18 and over. The survey was telephone-based and was carried out using stratified dual-frame random sample based on a complete list of landline and mobile phone numbers operating in Russia. The data were weighted according to selection probability and social and demographic characteristics. The margin of error at a 95% confidence level does not exceed 2.5%. In addition to sampling error, minor changes in question wording and different circumstances arising during the fieldwork can introduce bias into the survey.

 

Over the last year or two, have you personally encountered the news in mass media or on the Internet which subsequently turned out to be fake? If yes, where did you encounter that? (closed-ended question, up to 5 answers, % of total respondents)

 

Total respondents

Incomplete secondary education

Secondary education

Specialized secondary education  

Incomplete higher, higher  education

No, I have not

47

71

57

52

38

Yes, on the Internet

31

16

23

29

38

Yes, on television

20

12

15

16

26

Yes, in newspapers (print media)

7

8

6

5

9

Yes, on the radio

5

2

4

3

7

Yes, in other sources  

1

0

1

1

2

Don’t know

8

3

7

9

10

When you saw/heard such news, did you know from the beginning that the information was wrong, or did the news seem trustworthy to you in the beginning and it was only later that you found out it was fake? (closed-ended question, one answer, % of those who encountered fake news in mass media and on the Internet)

 

% of those who encountered fake news in mass media and on the Internet 

Moscow and St Petersburg

Million cities

More than 500 ths

100–500 ths

Less than 100 ths

Rural area

I felt from the beginning something was wrong

62

74

62

52

65

61

55

First I believed and it was only later that I found out I was fake  

31

23

33

31

26

31

42

Don’t know

7

3

5

17

9

8

3

Let us talk about well-known stories which turned out to be fake. In your opinion, were most of those untrustworthy stories published deliberately or unintentionally? (closed-ended question, one answer, % of those who encountered fake news in mass media and on the Internet)

 

% of those who encountered fake news in mass media and on the Internet 

Aged 18-24

Aged 25-34

Aged 35-44

Aged 45-59

Aged 60 and more

In most of cases the stories were published deliberately

74

69

79

84

76

63

In most of cases the stories were published accidentally, by an unintentional mistake made by journalists or editors

17

26

16

9

14

22

Don’t know

9

5

5

7

10

15

Note: Using materials from the site www.wciom.ru or wciom.com, as well as distributed by VCIOM, the reference to the source (or hyperlink for the electronic media) is obligatory!

Read the article in Russian